clevermanka (
clevermanka) wrote2006-02-09 08:44 am
Entry tags:
Opinions are like a...yeah, you know
I made this comment in a friend's locked post today but thought I'd cut the general text and paste it here. Here at KU it's the month of the February Sisters, with lots of feminist lectures, activities, etc. February also, unfortunately, saw the death of Betty Friedan this year.
I'm a feminist. Very much so. And yet I would love to be a "home-maker"--build a warm, friendly, and efficient home for someone. I would love to cook frugal, tasty meals and incorporate leftovers into fantastic second-dinners. I would love to sew fun, artistic, yet classic clothing items for a partner. I would love to have the time to volunteer at the Merc. I would love to devote time to working on art projects without worrying about them being my main source of income. I would love to Take Care of a partner and, quite literally, have that be my job (For now I Take Care of graduate students and that's a decent compromise).
I've been bashed several times by feminists who believe that the Women's Liberation Movement was about gaining personal and financial independence for women no matter what the cost. I believe that the Women's Liberation Movement was about giving women a choice.
I am a feminist, yes. I believe women should have the option to pursue whatever career path they chose, and get paid the same as a male counterpart. But I know that for myself, I am more comfortable in the standard gender-role stereotype of caregiver. There are a lot of women like me who are disparaged so often for this that many of us have fallen into the sad attitude of "I'm not a feminist, but..." And that makes me so very, very angry--at the women themselves who stopped fighting for that feminist title, and the women, calling themselves feminists, who eventually wore them down.
OK, that said, here is my piece I wrote on the tongue-piercing experience: Biting the Bullet. It's a PDF file. Deal. EDIT:
professormass was kind enough to put the document in HTML format for you guys. Here 'tis, not that anyone's mentioned it. *cough*
My wrist is aching today from too much typing yesterday, so I'm taking it easy today.
I'm a feminist. Very much so. And yet I would love to be a "home-maker"--build a warm, friendly, and efficient home for someone. I would love to cook frugal, tasty meals and incorporate leftovers into fantastic second-dinners. I would love to sew fun, artistic, yet classic clothing items for a partner. I would love to have the time to volunteer at the Merc. I would love to devote time to working on art projects without worrying about them being my main source of income. I would love to Take Care of a partner and, quite literally, have that be my job (For now I Take Care of graduate students and that's a decent compromise).
I've been bashed several times by feminists who believe that the Women's Liberation Movement was about gaining personal and financial independence for women no matter what the cost. I believe that the Women's Liberation Movement was about giving women a choice.
I am a feminist, yes. I believe women should have the option to pursue whatever career path they chose, and get paid the same as a male counterpart. But I know that for myself, I am more comfortable in the standard gender-role stereotype of caregiver. There are a lot of women like me who are disparaged so often for this that many of us have fallen into the sad attitude of "I'm not a feminist, but..." And that makes me so very, very angry--at the women themselves who stopped fighting for that feminist title, and the women, calling themselves feminists, who eventually wore them down.
OK, that said, here is my piece I wrote on the tongue-piercing experience: Biting the Bullet. It's a PDF file. Deal. EDIT:
My wrist is aching today from too much typing yesterday, so I'm taking it easy today.

no subject
no subject
I believe the true sign of success with the feminist movement is not that it will only liberate women but men will realize that it frees them as well. With the freedom from a requirement to compromise to a gender driven live path for BOTH sexes, people can now choose to set up their relationship in the way that make the most equitable, rewarding manner to THEM. That said, I think our sex in general still struggles with the choice and many still view the choice to be a homemaker as a less valuable one. Perhaps we're not far enough beyond the days where choice was not there, not secure enough in the recent changes - but I have hope for us yet.
no subject
Now that being said - if you have personal and financial independence, and you CHOOSE to put that towards caretaking, towards partnership, fuck anybody who says otherwise.
no subject
no subject
extremists and psychos. the lot.
;)
no subject
AUGH. Must. Stop. Typing.
no subject
YES. And that applies to everything. I've been banging that drum for two years, now, and no one wants to hear it. The BBC is now quoting James Dobson (http://www.family.org/docstudy/) - that's power. Fanaticism is mainstream now, and people need to sit up and take notice. No more can these people be dismissed as fringe freaks with no credibility. They're the ones with the influence, with momentum in their organizations.
I realise this is a bit of a digression from the line of your discussion, but I got all excited by your statement.
no subject
I am most definitely a feminist and don't see that changing. Do I see that to be in conflict with my current blissful role as Susi-Homemaker? Not at all. Because it is what *I* choose to do and how *we* choose to run out lives together as equal partners. Of course, I define that differently than oh, say, Red. But that is the cool part of having choices; we get to make them based on our life's experiences and personal philosophies.
Bottom Line? I don't trust bigots nor zealots of any flavor. And yeah, I'll be in their faces about it if I need to be.
no subject
Neither can men, for that matter.
no subject
That and she thought my dad was the devil incarnate because he was management at a chemical company.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
For myself, I could never allow myself to be wholly finanically dependent on another person, or put in the socialized position of being subsurvient to another's needs, as it is giving over too much control of my own existence. This is wholly based on my need to be in control of my life, thanks to my early relationship experiences (including the abusive first marriage). I will meet a partner in the middle (meaning equitable split of finances and household duties, but nothing more. But you see, that is what equal means to me.
D.
no subject
no subject
I'm not sure what the answer is. I'm just kind of blabbering here. I see the nurturing/care-taking as an equal opportunity. I don't want it to be one-sided. I think if I didn't care if it were one-sided because that's what a woman is supposed to do, THEN it would be an issue. I see it as openly sharing myself from my heart, and I love doing it, and I want it in return. That just seems like a caring, human quality of a nurturing person--male or female . . .
no subject
That's my quarrel with the Left that keeps me centerward and got me into all kinds of trouble in surprisingly-political Social Work school: you must be allowed to be your own woman, man, hetero/homosexual, member of a minority group, or whatever. Left or right, no one has the right to tell you how to live, ever.
I think it's a tremendously retrograde idea to demand that all of X group be of X political stripe or inclination. It's easily as un-American as wiretapping without a warrant. Here are a couple of simple steps to address this situation.
1) Announce your intention to give these fascist feminists the finger;
2) Do so with great gusto and perhaps verbal accompaniment.
3) Repeat as necessary.
4) Go about your business as you see fit.
You dated a white male?
Jock #1: [at a party] What's up, babes?
Womynist #1: Pack up your rape culture and take a hike!
Jock #1: [holds up a beer] You want a brewdog?
Womynist #1: We're not interested in your penis!
Womynist #2: Wait, wait, I think he's offering us a beer.
[turns to jock, speaks slowly]
Womynist #2: Um... Yes. We, would like, a beer.
Jock #1: Okay!
[turns around to get a beer]
Womynist #1: So it's like, if you're nice to them, they *bring* you things?
Womynist #2: Exactly.
Re: You dated a white male?
*bangs head here*
Re: You dated a white male?
I slip up and use it now and again, in front of professors. Some of them are not amused.
Yeah, I'm with you on the "it's about a person's choice to do wtf they want to do, and sod off the rest."
Weirdos.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Anybody who tries to include me in their self-defined group, and then castigate me for not living up to their idea of what that means, is a dumbass whom I promptly ignore.
The most obvious example are pagans. I will self-identify as a pagan, for lack of a better word, and then get told I'm not.
Therefore, I summarily ignore the people who call themselves 'pagan' and then tell me I can't be. They are in the Dumbass File.
Also, your story was quite a touching 'coming of age' thing. I liked it.
no subject
no subject
Sorry it took me so long. Been a busy-ish day, and I wanted to give it a full read before commenting.
The ending made me laugh out loud.
no subject
True ending.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Heya! Thanks for posting the piercing story, it was great to read it again. Brings back lots of memories of you hearing you talk funny while we hung out at work together.
Feminism
no subject
I am not a feminist, only because the first group of women that used that as a lable were bitter seperatist lesbians who were so mean and cruel to a young bisexual seeking community and support that I will always tie the two together. Though most of my friends identify as feminists. And I think that the ultimate equality is for anyone regardless of gender to be able to make the choices they want to make. If anyone of either gender wants to be a homemaker then they should be able to do so, or a stay at home parent, or a collared domestic, or a fast track career person.