clevermanka (
clevermanka) wrote2013-07-08 09:51 am
The Heat
You might have seen the previews for The Heat, yeah?
The preview does not come even close to the awesome brilliance that is this movie.
mckitterick and I saw it yesterday and just thinking about it now makes my eyes tingle with tears from the sheer fantastic amazingness of this movie. If you liked the 21 Jump Street movie, The Heat will make you so so so happy. I would have sworn the two movies shared a writer, director, or producer because The Heat seems to have so many references to 21 Jump Street, but looking at IMDB, they seem to be coincidences. BEAUTIFUL, GLORIOUS COINCIDENCES.
The film is feminist in a way that no other movie I've seen has approached feminism. The commentary on how women are treated different from men is subtle and brilliant. Bullock's character, Ashburn, is despised by nearly everyone in the FBI because she is smart, capable, efficient, showy, and absolutely brilliant at her job. But because she doesn't have a penis, everyone despises her for these qualities and one character utters the line "I wonder why she's single." ZING! McCarthy's character, Mullins, is perfectly written as the (traditionally male) socially maladjusted, loudmouth cop. Everyone is (justifiably) terrified of her even though at her core she just really cares about keeping her neighborhood safe.
One of the things that drives me batty about these male writers who like to take credit for writing "strong female characters" (HELLO JOSS, I AM LOOKING AT YOU, YOU ASSHOLE) is that they might be trying to write Strong Female Characters but they are still writing fucking female characters. A truly strong female character is indistinguishable from a strong male character in the text. Let's take a look at the single one example I can immediately think of as a StrongFemale Character whose story didn't rely on her having a uterus:
I heard it rumored that Ripley was originally written as a man, and that wouldn't surprise me at all. See how that works, folks? Just write a fucking person and then call it/cast it as a woman. Sure, you might have to switch out a few phrases, but the overall sense of the character doesn't need to change.
And that is exactly what the writer of The Heat did. Oh, FUCKING SURPRISE! The writer of this movie? Is a woman.
So I'm begging you, if you like this sort of movie (comedy, cop show, explosions, foul language, ridiculous situations), go see this in the theater. Give it your support and your money. Show the film industry that movies about women--strong women, funny women, women who talk about things other than their diets or sex lives--can make money. Please. PLEASE. Don't wait for this one to come out on video. This movie and everyone involved in it deserves the vote of your dollar.
The preview does not come even close to the awesome brilliance that is this movie.
The film is feminist in a way that no other movie I've seen has approached feminism. The commentary on how women are treated different from men is subtle and brilliant. Bullock's character, Ashburn, is despised by nearly everyone in the FBI because she is smart, capable, efficient, showy, and absolutely brilliant at her job. But because she doesn't have a penis, everyone despises her for these qualities and one character utters the line "I wonder why she's single." ZING! McCarthy's character, Mullins, is perfectly written as the (traditionally male) socially maladjusted, loudmouth cop. Everyone is (justifiably) terrified of her even though at her core she just really cares about keeping her neighborhood safe.
One of the things that drives me batty about these male writers who like to take credit for writing "strong female characters" (HELLO JOSS, I AM LOOKING AT YOU, YOU ASSHOLE) is that they might be trying to write Strong Female Characters but they are still writing fucking female characters. A truly strong female character is indistinguishable from a strong male character in the text. Let's take a look at the single one example I can immediately think of as a Strong
I heard it rumored that Ripley was originally written as a man, and that wouldn't surprise me at all. See how that works, folks? Just write a fucking person and then call it/cast it as a woman. Sure, you might have to switch out a few phrases, but the overall sense of the character doesn't need to change.
And that is exactly what the writer of The Heat did. Oh, FUCKING SURPRISE! The writer of this movie? Is a woman.
So I'm begging you, if you like this sort of movie (comedy, cop show, explosions, foul language, ridiculous situations), go see this in the theater. Give it your support and your money. Show the film industry that movies about women--strong women, funny women, women who talk about things other than their diets or sex lives--can make money. Please. PLEASE. Don't wait for this one to come out on video. This movie and everyone involved in it deserves the vote of your dollar.

no subject
no subject
It's so awesome, I even posted about it on FaceBook for godssake.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
One of the reasons I didn't like Alien 3 was that it did exactly that--turned her sex into something that defined her. It was to me an unfortunate development to somehow feminize her in a way that set her apart from everyone else in the movie. Thus relegating her to the Woman's Role in nearly every other movie ever. But even so, the plot of the movie didn't define her character. That had already been established in the first one.
no subject
no subject
Exactly.
I fucking love the Alien and Predator franchises (well, except for Predator 2). Hell, I even love the AVP movies, although for very different reasons than I love Alien by itself.
no subject
Joss just doesn't know how to write two hour story archs. He's good when he can get 24 episodes to make his point, but not so much in shorter media forms.
no subject
no subject
That said he did it uncredited. He wrote Alien 4 with a credit, which implies to me that he was trying to set up a long term story arch.
(I only know this because of the commentary tracks on the Blu-Rays.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I disagree about writing genderblind. It can serve a good purpose sometimes, as an experiment, but when that's put forward as "the way to do it" (as in, you should just write a Hero Person, not a Hero Female Person) then the default Person will still default to Man. Until we convince culture that women are 51% of people and that a Female Hero who is Very Womanly In Her Heroism is as cool/important/strong as Men, then it won't work well enough.
Also my head hurts so I'm not sure I'm being clear. I really just want to say that I don't think we're ready for "genderblind" to equal anything other than "masculine."
no subject
I think I understand you, but I disagree with you that it can't be done. And that's cool!
Yeah, I was SO not impressed with the previews for The Heat, but man oh man I'm glad I gave it a chance based on stuff I saw on Tumblr. Similarly, the previews for Pacific Rim still send me into a stupor of yawns but I'm going to go see it opening weekend so I can support an action movie that isn't all America-Fuck-Yeah-focused and features POC in quality roles.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Basically, yeah. Until social attitudes adjust to accomodate the fact that women are actually legitimate people in their own right, the 'genderblind' definition to everyone just defaults to 'white male'. Which is irritating but sadly true.
no subject
no subject
no subject
*sigh*
no subject
no subject
My problem with the way "Strong Female Characters" as they are written right now by people who claim to be feminist is that...they aren't (the characters or the writers, IMO). Exhibit A (http://data.whicdn.com/images/14903233/1256285317_1280x960_cool-eliza-dushku-wallpaper_large.jpg) and Exhibit B (http://www.firefly.withoutshadow.com/wallpaper/serenity_official/inara_1280x1024.jpg). Notice the toting guns in both examples, too.
Edit: You know, I think I just really have a hate-on for Joss Whedon.
no subject
no subject
*fistbump*
no subject
no subject
no subject
male writers who like to take credit for writing "strong female characters" (HELLO JOSS, I AM LOOKING AT YOU, YOU ASSHOLE) is that they might be trying to write Strong Female Characters but they are still writing fucking female characters. A truly strong female character is indistinguishable from a strong male character in the text.
Ohgodyes. There really is a difference between an actual female character and "Girls Kick Ass!" which 90% of the time comes down to some sort of male fantasy character (see: Charlie's Angels, Sucker Punch, etc...). Ugh.
I don't agree that they are indistinguishable from a male in the text, though. There is nothing keeping a female from being feminine and and pretty... even passive, and still being a great character. Failing the Bechtel test, I think, is an example of institutionalized sexism, not of personal. It is, however, an example of really shitty writing. (And Alien 3 & 4 suffered from that... shame, because 1 & 2 were so good...)
...I'll go and see The Heat on your recommendation. But it looks like genderswapped Tango & Cash to me (and that is a classic example of bad MALE character writing...)
no subject
If you hated the 21 Jump Street movie, don't bother seeing this one.
There really is a difference between an actual female character and "Girls Kick Ass!" which 90% of the time comes down to some sort of male fantasy character (see: Charlie's Angels, Sucker Punch, etc...). Ugh.
I don't agree that they are indistinguishable from a male in the text, though.
Your view coincides with
no subject
no subject
And, yeah, Alien 3 was utter dreck; whether or not you like Joss, it was a train wreck production, and can't be blamed on any one person. It is the only Charles Dance movie I try to actively ignore.
no subject
Interesting!
It's good to know I'm not alone in my hatred of Alien 3. GOD DAMN I loathe that movie.
no subject
no subject