clevermanka (
clevermanka) wrote2014-01-27 12:50 pm
Entry tags:
Fandom rant
Last week
kazoogrrl commented something about fandom and source creator overlap and I made a short reply about how I don't think that's a good idea. Here is one fantastic Tumblr post that highlights a lot of the why I feel this way, and here is another one. Motherfucking truth bombs, yo.
Also? I wish people would wake up to the fact that Martin Freeman and Amanda Abbington are (probably) selfish, rude trolls. I mean, they're human beings and most of humanity sucks. They're fantastic actors and I love what they do with their roles, but it STOPS THERE, people. You don't have to like the actor. They lie for a living for godssake.
Also also, my response to Amanda's ridiculous complaint that people are really drawing MARTIN and BEN having TEH SEXXINGS and not John and Sherlock and this is so apparent because nobody's drawing BASIL RATHBONE porny pics? I'll just put this here.


Also? I wish people would wake up to the fact that Martin Freeman and Amanda Abbington are (probably) selfish, rude trolls. I mean, they're human beings and most of humanity sucks. They're fantastic actors and I love what they do with their roles, but it STOPS THERE, people. You don't have to like the actor. They lie for a living for godssake.
Also also, my response to Amanda's ridiculous complaint that people are really drawing MARTIN and BEN having TEH SEXXINGS and not John and Sherlock and this is so apparent because nobody's drawing BASIL RATHBONE porny pics? I'll just put this here.



no subject
Love that cartoon!
no subject
no subject
LJ wants me to read your posts, so I obliged... :)
(In all seriousness, I have ambivalent feelings about RPF featuring still-living people: I don't disapprove of it, but I feel odd about it, in this internet age.)
Re: LJ wants me to read your posts, so I obliged... :)
Re: LJ wants me to read your posts, so I obliged... :)
Similarly, I don't go out of my way to read RPF, but I've read a little of it, including a few pieces I quite like -- though I suppose the fact that I actually know very little about the actors in question makes it easier to read these things, because they're only very slightly removed from fiction to me.
(I have even written an RPF -- which surprised the heck out of me at the time! -- based on extremely limited knowledge of the real people and situation it referred to. I like how the story came out, but it is the opposite of well-researched, and certainly if I were sitting down to write serious historical fiction I wouldn't do it by the seat of my pants like that. :) )
But I share some of the squick feeling, too, because it does feel weird writing fiction about people who are still around to a) have their reputations affected or b) read about themselves. However remote the possibility of either. It feels like violation in some way -- though I have to say, I sympathize with both sides of the original creator/fanwork creator divide, in that having one's creative work rewritten does feel like violation in some way too.
I don't mean to say "fanwork is not okay," but rather "fanwork has its uncomfortable side." Maybe I see it as similar to when a politician or celebrity has satirical cartoons drawn of them or is criticized in the press: it's okay for those things to happen, and really you shouldn't be surprised when they do happen, but it's still not necessarily fun to have happen to you, and I have sympathy for the not-fun feelings, too.
(Huh, I didn't think I was going to make a big long speech here, when I started this comment...)
Re: LJ wants me to read your posts, so I obliged... :)
Pretty much, yeah. Except for Tom Hiddleston. Who is perfect.
Re: LJ wants me to read your posts, so I obliged... :)
Tom Hiddleston may be too perfect for me, he's just so nice. And well rounded. He must have a flaw in there somewhere.
Re: LJ wants me to read your posts, so I obliged... :)
Re: LJ wants me to read your posts, so I obliged... :)
Re: LJ wants me to read your posts, so I obliged... :)
http://a-wild-hiddlesaurous.tumblr.com/post/75034341926/torrilla-tom-hiddleston-a-god-among-men
Re: LJ wants me to read your posts, so I obliged... :)
Re: LJ wants me to read your posts, so I obliged... :)
One of the first fanfics I read was a Hiddleston RPF that portrayed him as a possessive mental abuser, and I detested my reaction to it, wondering if there was some truth to the fiction....
Re: LJ wants me to read your posts, so I obliged... :)
no subject
no subject
http://ireallyshouldbedrawing.tumblr.com/
no subject
no subject
I keep thinking that if Freeman and Abington's kids are fairly young, their online time should be supervised so they don't stumble across adult content that may involve the character their dad plays as his job. And if the kids are old enough to go online themselves w/o any parental supervision or blocks or whatever then they are old enough for the parents to sit down and talk to them about this situation. Uncomfortable? Probably, but that's part of the parental duties.
no subject
This is true of any children, though, regardless of if their parents are famous.
no subject
ETA: Which, to me, shows how universal is the situation. Sure, they'll have to touch upon one super-awkward extra component about what is online. But every parent should be monitoring and educating their kids and seriously, I'd think the kids would have to go looking for this fic/art to find out.
One thing I would really worry about is bullying from other kids who know it's out there, I can imagine being a child and mortified if teased about such a thing.
no subject
no subject
* I can't be the only person who hears Bill Hicks' voice in my head whenever I see that phrase, can I?
no subject
no subject
no subject
I can't find a video of it to put on LJ. They're all weird and won't embed. D'you have one?
no subject
http://www.themarysue.com/tom-hiddleston-captain-america-cameo/
no subject
no subject
http://www.themarysue.com/thor-the-dark-world-deleted-scene/
no subject
no subject
no subject
Also, I ended up on this Wikipedia entry the other day and it definitely added to my understanding of the many many ways in which Loki is an outsider:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergi
no subject
When it comes to any fandom that has multiple incarnations, "canon" is pretty much applied only to the particular incarnation. So, for Sherlock fandom, ACD canon isn't necessarily canon to BBC Sherlock (although we mine it for possibilities), and Ritchie-verse Sherlock canon isn't interchangeable with BBC, etc. I imagine it's the same with the Marvel comics vs. movies.
no subject
no subject
"But that still doesn’t explain why this scene required Tom Hiddleston to wear his own Captain America suit."
Hahaha! He's such a big, dorky fan that I bet he requested it.
no subject
no subject
Now, I KNOW you've seen the gif of him from his Thor audition, yes?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject